posted by
drew at 07:15pm on 07/01/2006 under undreamt of in my philosophy
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For the second year in a row, my mother has bought me jeans for Christmas that are not the proper size or fit. She did, to her credit, get the store right (Eddie Bauer -- for some reason their jeans match my build better), bbut nevertheless I had to go do the exchange.
Last year, she got the right size, but not the right fit. This year, she got the right fit (or so I thought), but not the right size. I tried them on, and instead of just being too loose in the waist (as I'd expected), they fit strangely. I was not amused. Apparently in the past year they've changed the cut/pattern of their jeans such that the fit I'd been wearing no longer exists (the name does, but it's cut differently now). So I had to go make the exchange, which I would have done anyway given what I actually got, but now the goal wasn't just an exchange, but a fit test.
Long story short, I returned the jeans I got for Christmas and bought myself a nice pair of boot-cut (rather than my previous favorite Classic Fit) jeans in a wonderful dark indigo wash. But here's the kicker: I had to pay $30 more than my mother had paid.
I looked at the ticket in shock. Apparently I am now the owner of a $60 pair of jeans. I would not have bought them if I'd had to pay full price. My limit with jeans is around $30, which is what I paid. But who charges $60 for a pair of jeans? (I mean other than Lucky and such "designer" jeans, which are ridiculous already) Clearly I missed clothing inflation -- I still think $20 is a lot for a pair of jeans, and I expect to pay $10 for a t-shirt. I'm too young to have sticker shock.
Still, the jeans fit very well, and I love the color. Here's hoping they last as long as my other ones did (which is not long as far as most people are concerned, but I wear nothing but jeans between November and April, and only have two pair).
Last year, she got the right size, but not the right fit. This year, she got the right fit (or so I thought), but not the right size. I tried them on, and instead of just being too loose in the waist (as I'd expected), they fit strangely. I was not amused. Apparently in the past year they've changed the cut/pattern of their jeans such that the fit I'd been wearing no longer exists (the name does, but it's cut differently now). So I had to go make the exchange, which I would have done anyway given what I actually got, but now the goal wasn't just an exchange, but a fit test.
Long story short, I returned the jeans I got for Christmas and bought myself a nice pair of boot-cut (rather than my previous favorite Classic Fit) jeans in a wonderful dark indigo wash. But here's the kicker: I had to pay $30 more than my mother had paid.
I looked at the ticket in shock. Apparently I am now the owner of a $60 pair of jeans. I would not have bought them if I'd had to pay full price. My limit with jeans is around $30, which is what I paid. But who charges $60 for a pair of jeans? (I mean other than Lucky and such "designer" jeans, which are ridiculous already) Clearly I missed clothing inflation -- I still think $20 is a lot for a pair of jeans, and I expect to pay $10 for a t-shirt. I'm too young to have sticker shock.
Still, the jeans fit very well, and I love the color. Here's hoping they last as long as my other ones did (which is not long as far as most people are concerned, but I wear nothing but jeans between November and April, and only have two pair).
There are 6 comments on this entry. (reply.)